Austin's Zoning Principles (opinion)

The City of Austin has established twelve Zoning Principles as a guide to preserve the
compatibility of land uses. City Staff, stakeholders and property owners should use the
following principles to evaluate all zoning requests.

The following table summarizes my opinion on how these principles are being  used for each development.

If you'd like to provide your opinions, download the table, fill it out and send in back to me.

Principle	Residential	PUD
Zoning should be consistent with the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) or adopted neighborhood plan. (We have none of these so I answered using existing zoning)	Yes	No
Zoning should satisfy a public need and not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner; the request should not result in spot zoning.	Yes	No
Granting a request for zoning should result in an equal treatment of similarly situated properties.	Yes	No
Granting the zoning should not in any way set an undesirable precedent for other properties in the neighborhood or within other areas of the city.	Yes	No
Zoning should allow for a reasonable use of the property.	Yes	Yes
Zoning should promote a transition between adjacent and nearby zoning districts, land uses, and development intensities.	Yes	No
Zoning should promote the policy of locating retail and more intensive zoning near the intersections of arterial roadways or at the intersections of arterials and major collectors.	Yes	No
The request should serve to protect and preserve places and areas of historical and cultural significance.	No	No
Zoning should promote clearly identified community goals such as creating employment opportunities or providing for affordable housing.	No	No
A change in conditions has occurred within the area indicating that there is a basis for changing the originally established zoning and/or development restrictions for the property.	No	No
The rezoning should be consistent with the policies adopted by the City Council or Planning Commission/Zoning and Platting Commission.	Yes	?
Zoning changes should promote compatibility with adjacent and nearby uses and should not result in detrimental impacts to the neighborhood character.	Yes	No
Summary	Yes 9 No 3	Yes 1 No 10 ? 1